query-b68258a29f761e26d0211f343d9627cf

rq turtle/ttl

Discussion) (Q461572)SoHo An initialism should be just initials, so Orange is a bad example. It includes acronyms (which you should be able to pronounce as words), but also tongue-twisting jumbles of letters. Its key requirement is that its a sequence of initial letters extracted from a title that are commonly used to describe it. Normally all capitals, but sometimes mixed (eg ("Foreign Office", "FCO", "FCDO" ect) (Q358834)Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (United States, States, US, USA), or organisation like the (Q30)United States of America are initialisms, but not all, and it will help for countries like (P1813)short name Some ]reply[10:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)) talk (Vicarage qualifier to the existing property. What property should be used for the qualifier? (Q918270)initialism , not replacing it. The key question is whether there are enough examples to make it worth having a new property, rather than having a (P1813)short name it need not be single valued. I'd see it being used in addition to ]reply[11:16, 30 August 2024 (UTC)) talk (Flominator, but be able to completely remove the abbreviation aspect from it, in order to only use it for shorted forms. --(P1813)short name , my bad) and added FCDO instead. Yes, the idea would not be to replace (P1813)short name Thanks. I removed Orange (that was an example for ]reply[16:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)) talk (ArthurPSmith? (Q52714313)Changpeng Zhao This seems reasonable to me - I do have a question about the domain for this property. The examples are all organizations (or a country), but presumably anything that is (sometimes) referred to only by initials would qualify? Like CZ for Support ]reply[07:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)) talk (FlominatorI must admit, that I had never heard of CZ, but instantly came up with JFK instead. Good point, though. I added CZ as example. --]reply[05:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)) talk (Vicarage (P1813)short name Done for ]reply[16:00, 1 September 2024 (UTC)) talk (FlominatorThat's also a way. Thank you. Should this be put in the property documentation? ]reply[14:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)) talk (Vicarage modified. (Q30)United States of America ]reply[14:09, 1 September 2024 (UTC)) talk (FlominatorCan you please show me as example, how that would look like for UK or USA? -- ]reply[07:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)) talk (Vicarage is the way to go. (P1813)short name your argument has convinced me that documenting qualifiers to Oppose ]reply[06:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)) talk (Nikki as a qualifier. - (P3831)object of statement has role I wouldn't mind a separate property for abbreviations, but this won't achieve what you want it to achieve. There are various ways to make abbreviations which are not initialisms, and a single abbreviation can combine more than one method. Those would not belong in this property and creating a separate property for every single type (and combination of types) that can be used would make the data hard to enter/use. I think it would make more sense to use something like Oppose ]reply[14:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC) 💛●✒️●💬 Bouzinac ?(P1813)short name . Would there be people doing the job of splitting the current content of (P1813)short name should be aware of this property proposal as it aiming at splitting "short but not too short words" // "very short or only first letters" that are currently inside (P1813)short name Those that created Neutral

Use at

PREFIX wikibase: <http://wikiba.se/ontology#>
PREFIX wdt: <http://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/>
PREFIX wd: <http://www.wikidata.org/entity/>
PREFIX ps: <http://www.wikidata.org/prop/statement/>
PREFIX pq: <http://www.wikidata.org/prop/qualifier/>
PREFIX p: <http://www.wikidata.org/prop/>
PREFIX bd: <http://www.bigdata.com/rdf#>

SELECT DISTINCT ?item ?itemLabel ?initials WHERE {
  SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en-GB,en,mul". }
  ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q6256;
  p:P1813 [ ps:P1813 ?initials; pq:P3831 wd:Q918270].
}

Query found at