query-9e5daecab104ad326968ba2601d1a739
Notability? ]reply[18:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)) talk (AinaliPodcast episodes are likely not generally notable, so it would be nice with documentation (and preceding discussion) of how the selection of episodes should be done. ]reply[10:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)) talk (Back acheFor me, the importance of anything is the interconnections they are part of (inside and outside of WikiData). It terms of episode as a stand alone items, some podcasts have some real insights in them and go deep in subjects that normally lack good references. It would be good to encourage linking a podcast to a transcipt so it's worth could be understood with having to spend 30mins listening to them. ]reply[15:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)) talk (AinaliYes, I like the way that you are thinking. I agree on all, except possibly about the "25 best rated", which is not really creating notability. More so if the episodes get on a national yearly top-100 list or something like that. ]reply[10:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)) talk (Egon Willighagen broke news that led to public debate has a quote of a notable quest, relevant to public debate among the 25 best rated episodes from a notable podcast had more than 1 million listeners (to be tuned, likely, for inclusiveness, so perhaps as percentage of citizen of the country hosting the podcast; etc) )(Q124268563)Hendrik Jan & Albert ontvangen Happy Achterhoeker Freek Rikkerink (Suzan & Freek) mentioned in a national newspaper (perhaps like Valid question, I think. I do not know the answer and some guidance is most welcome. For me a podcast episode is notable, I can imagine, if (but not limited to): won’t be guaranteed (as far I know) to have review for each of its episodes. (Q2856080)Radiolab or (Q16001236)99% Invisible ², which nobody bats an eye on − but to be fair even the worst TV show will have per-episode reviews. Conversely, even a blockbuster like (Q21191270)television series episode It’s a difficult question. I think that podcasts are very under-served when it comes to sources. Let‘s compare with other mediums: we have 150K instances of ]reply[09:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)) talk (Jean-Fred. In that sense, it could almost be argued that episode items fulfil a structural need. (P5030)talk show guest ? Then you need individual episodes with (Q30323986)The Joe Rogan Experience or (Q7956150)WTF with Marc Maron But here’s another way to look at it: I think if we want to do anything interesting with podcast data, it will often require episode-level granularity. One example − want to query for the gender balance of guests to ]reply[20:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)) talk (AinaliHmm, if any arbitrary query one can think of about stats suddenly could be counted as structural need, then surely everything and anything is notable. ² Query:
Use at
- https://query.wikidata.org/sparql
PREFIX wikibase: <http://wikiba.se/ontology#>
PREFIX wdt: <http://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/>
PREFIX wd: <http://www.wikidata.org/entity/>
PREFIX bd: <http://www.bigdata.com/rdf#>
SELECT ?type ?typeLabel (COUNT(?episode) AS ?count) WHERE {
SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "[AUTO_LANGUAGE],en". }
?episode wdt:P31 ?type.
?type (wdt:P279*) wd:Q1983062.
}
GROUP BY ?type ?typeLabel
ORDER BY DESC (?count)