query-9566ecfc155f74595b62d43ac863c2b3
Modeling the ratings and reviews of criticsIs anyone aware of a precedent for general modeling of quality ratings and reviews by critics? Expert organizations and commentators routinely rate and review media, places, products, and organizations. Here are some examples: - media suitability ratings(Q5165090)content rating - rates environmental factors, like public access to parks(Q637866)book review - is an academic field which presents commentary on all sorts of media(Q58854)literary criticism - rates consumer products like toasters, dishwashers, and sunscreen(Q1329436)consumer organization - rates new books(Q637866)book review Every big budget, book, music collection, video game, and movie gets critic ratings from lots of publications. In academia all sorts of individuals, organizations, and journals rate and review everything that is the subject of human discourse. Citizens, corporate entities, and government rate and review each other continually. What discussion already exists about bringing this into Wikidata? I am especially interested in brief ratings, either numbers on a scale, a grade, single words, or a generalization like pass/fail. Let's put complex ratings and reviews, like essays, aside for now. Possible paths forwardSomething else? Perhaps we match this with identifiers, as many ratings are from data collections?Have some general property which we adapt with qualifiers Seems unlikely as there are endless rating systems and the majority are small datasets of <100 ratingsHave Wikidata properties for every sort of rating 14:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC) (talk) Blue Rasberry Thanks. More than anything, I wish for anyone to speak up if they remember or can point to any previous or ongoing conversation. 14:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)) talk (Jean-FredHope that helps, (very little use so far [1])(Q61992233)video game review →(P136)genre , and potentially tagged with (P6977)review of or using items for the review, linked to the game via some statistics, and Q83265#P444 ; see for example (P444)review score Either directly on the game-item, using Reviews: still a budding area: used as qualifier.(P2676)rating certificate ID : we have properties for all(?) rating systems ; for some there is a (Q5165090)content rating : Wikidata:WikiProject_Video_games/Properties#Reception_propertiesThe current status is captured at .(Q7889)video game Hi Bluerasberry. I can give an overview of how things are done for [1]
Use at
- https://query.wikidata.org/sparql
PREFIX wikibase: <http://wikiba.se/ontology#>
PREFIX wdt: <http://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/>
PREFIX wd: <http://www.wikidata.org/entity/>
PREFIX bd: <http://www.bigdata.com/rdf#>
SELECT ?review ?game ?gameLabel WHERE {
SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "[AUTO_LANGUAGE],en". }
?review wdt:P6977 ?game.
?game wdt:P31/wdt:P279* wd:Q7889.
}