query-4417e2d81400180eec86a55d26911b1d
Artist of Black Lunch Table. Changing a bit the query we can found a lot of other items in the same condition. (Q28781198)Black Lunch Table =(P972)catalog and (P21)sex or gender , (Q5)human =(P31)instance of , now I have some doubt about notability of item that are in Wikidata only because they are artists of "Black Lunch Table". I prefere ask to see if community think that partecipation to Black Lunch Table is enough for notability. The following query is a first group of items without sitelink, backlink reference and the only property are: User:Heathart after some edit of User:GerardM in user page discussion of User:SjoerddebruinAfter discussion with So the question is: Are these items notable because they are in "Black Lunch Table" or "Black Lunch Table" isn't a sufficient condition to make notable these item and item like these (see the query result) must be deleted?
Use at
- https://query.wikidata.org/sparql
PREFIX wikibase: <http://wikiba.se/ontology#>
PREFIX wdt: <http://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/>
PREFIX wd: <http://www.wikidata.org/entity/>
PREFIX prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#>
PREFIX pr: <http://www.wikidata.org/prop/reference/>
PREFIX bd: <http://www.bigdata.com/rdf#>
SELECT DISTINCT ?item ?itemLabel
WHERE{
?item wikibase:sitelinks 0 .
?item wdt:P31 wd:Q5 .
?item wdt:P972 wd:Q28781198 .
?item wdt:P21 ?sex .
?item wikibase:statements ?statementCount.
FILTER(?statementCount = 3).
OPTIONAL{
?backlink ?p1 ?item .
}
FILTER(!bound(?backlink))
OPTIONAL{
?item ?p2 [prov:wasDerivedFrom ?ref] .
?ref ?pr [] .
FILTER (?pr != pr:P143) #no source
}
FILTER(!bound(?ref))
SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "[AUTO_LANGUAGE],en". }
}
Query found at
- https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2017/12/17
- https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2018/05/18