query-2e4207b4f69a89f68130dc5e1ae015e2
Wikidata:Lexemes for deletionHello, One question that remains problematic for me is the processes to monitor the addition in Wikidata lexicographical data. In Wiktionary projects, there is a control by peers to check for the existence of an information based on sources or attestation. For the existence of a certain language, we may have troubles, but there is external sources to check such as Glottolog, and we usually prefer to stick with the edge of linguistic investigation rather than to keep the ISO distinctions. Here, we could we discuss such issues? Then, for the existence of a certain word, we usually argues with attestations and not sources. Sources are document about a word, attestations are usages of a word. Attestations can came from published sources or any online text, including lyrics, films' transcriptions, forums, etc. In Wikidata, how to indicate attestations? Should they be copied like in Wiktionary? 16:53, 26 February 2018 (UTC)) talk (Noé (but multilingual)? Any other procedure to set up? Wikidata:Properties for deletion similarly as Wikidata:Lexemes for deletionThen, I guess RecentChanges can let people only see Lexeme changes plus changes on properties used in Lexeme items. But for the community to discuss, could we imagine a ). Right now, there is 9572 results (with some code in other databases, by the way 2163 of them has no code at all!) : where people can speak French about French words). In the end, the solution is always the more-or-less the same on every wikimedia projects: follow the sources. The languages have Q items so this is not specific to lexicography and you can already see what language already have an item or not (and created/complete the existing one FrançaisThis talk page can be used to discuss question about either a language or a word exists or not, some project can be created for specific needs (like a project I guess there will be a lot of various way and tools to monitor and check the L items (like there is thousand of tools for monitoring and checking the Q items, some may be adapted to fit the needs of the L items). Good question, here some thought (some well construct and obivous, some shaky, don't hesitate to tell me). ,NoéHi
Use at
- https://query.wikidata.org/sparql
PREFIX wikibase: <http://wikiba.se/ontology#>
PREFIX wdt: <http://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/>
PREFIX wd: <http://www.wikidata.org/entity/>
PREFIX bd: <http://www.bigdata.com/rdf#>
SELECT ?lang ?langLabel ?iso1 ?iso2 ?iso3 ?ethnologue ?linguasphere WHERE {
?lang wdt:P31/wdt:P279* wd:Q17376908 .
OPTIONAL { ?lang wdt:P218 ?iso1 }
OPTIONAL { ?lang wdt:P219 ?iso2 }
OPTIONAL { ?lang wdt:P220 ?iso3 }
OPTIONAL { ?lang wdt:P1627 ?ethnologue }
OPTIONAL { ?lang wdt:P1396 ?linguasphere }
SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "fr". }
}