query-00a3049a04c156e55278586f4a8d9faa
subclass of human. Is there a policy on this? It feels like bad practice from my experience, but I don't remember where I derived this sentiment from. (Q5)human (P31)instance of alongside anything(P31)instance of . I'm wary of using (Q414528)academician (P31)instance of (Q937)Albert Einstein . However, it feels wrong to me to actually use this as a class, eg. (Q5)human (P279)subclass of (Q414528)academician This claim currently exists: . (Q5)human but not (Q3778211)legal person ? It seems odd to have academician be a subclass of (Q3778211)legal person (P279)subclass of (Q9200127)member and (Q9200127)member (P279)subclass of (Q414528)academician ? If so, what about this other claim that currently exists: (Q414528)academician ? Should we remove that claim from (Q5)human (P279)subclass of . Is it bad practice to have (Q414528)academician In any case, I'm actually wondering what this means for Talk:Q414528 ยง How should this be used?Related but separate discussion is at ]reply[15:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)) talk (DaaskThere are quite a few subclasses like that, as you can see by querying it (257 results). The subclass statements seem correct to me, but individual humans are still only "instance of human" by convention.
Use at
- https://query.wikidata.org/sparql
PREFIX wikibase: <http://wikiba.se/ontology#>
PREFIX wdt: <http://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/>
PREFIX wd: <http://www.wikidata.org/entity/>
PREFIX bd: <http://www.bigdata.com/rdf#>
SELECT ?item ?itemLabel WHERE { ?item wdt:P279 wd:Q5. SERVICE wikibase:label {bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en"}
}